Disability Access Law Reform
Disability Access Law
Reform:
How Does It
Help Business Owners?
During the
2007-08 legislative session, the San Clemente
Chamber of Commerce and other business groups
worked closely with legislators and their staff
in respect to Disability Access Law Reform.
Through work such as ours, we have achieved
historic reform to California's disability
access laws.
The reform legislation,
SB 1608 (Corbett; D-San Leandro, Chapter
549, Statutes of 2008), is designed to
promote and increase compliance with laws
providing equal public access in places of
business to individuals with disabilities,
while reducing unwarranted litigation that does
not advance that goal.
This article
provides guidance to business on how SB 1608
helps to reduce unwarranted Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) litigation and what
business owners need to do to benefit from the
new law:
- How can business owners ensure compliance
and reduce chances of getting sued?
- If a business owner does get sued, how does
SB 1608 help to encourage early resolution of
the lawsuit?
- What elements of SB 1608 help to reduce
unwarranted ADA lawsuit practices?
|
Ensuring Compliance
How can
business owners ensure compliance and reduce
chances of getting sued?
One of the best
ways to avoid being sued under the disability
access laws is to ensure that buildings are in
compliance. SB 1608 provides a number of ways
to help business owners:
|
?Businesses
should hire a
CASp |
A certified access specialist (CASp) is
a person business owners can be assured has
been tested and certified by the state as an
expert in disability access laws.
SB
1608 sets up a process whereby business owners
can voluntarily hire a CASp to inspect their
buildings to ensure compliance with disability
access standards and obtain an inspection
report as proof they did so. A link to a list
of certified CASp inspectors is available here:
Certified CASp List of
Inspectors.
When: Businesses
should begin the process of obtaining an
inspection as soon as possible.
- As with any other hired consultant, a price
will need to be negotiated for this service. It
will pay to shop around and obtain trusted
referrals.
- Either building owners or tenants can order
a CASp inspection. (Either can be sued for
non-compliance.) If you are a tenant, you may
want to discuss with the building owner whether
a CASp inspection was already completed or if
there are plans for one.
- Businesses should ensure when they hire a
CASp that the CASp provides an inspection
report detailing what was inspected. SB 1608
requires the CASp to notify you of the right to
an inspection report. Without one, business
owners will not have proof of the inspection.
- If the CASp determines that corrections are
needed in order for the site to be approved,
the business owner is entitled to a written
report identifying changes that need to be made
and recommended reasonable timeframes for
fixes.
- Business owners should keep the inspection
report confidential and in a safe place. If you
are ever sued, you must have a CASp inspection
report in order to be eligible to request a
90-day stay of the lawsuit and an Early
Evaluation Conference. If you do not have a
report, you will be barred from this benefit.
|
|
?Businesses
should request and post a CASp window sign.
Businesses whose structures have been
approved by CASp will be able to request a
window sign signifying they have been
CASp-inspected. The window sign will send the
message that the business has taken proactive
steps to comply with the disability access laws
and is not an easy target for lawyers seeking
to earn quick
money. |
When: The official window signs
should be available by March 1, 2009.
|
?Improved
expertise in new construction and building
inspections. For the first time, there
will be minimum continuing education
requirements for building inspectors and
architects on disability access laws, to help
reduce the problem of new construction failing
to comply. Moreover, by July 2010, local
building inspection offices will be required to
have at least one CASp on staff, available to
provide consultation. Eventually all permitting
and plan checks must be
CASp-inspected. |
When: The continuing education
requirement will apply to license renewals
beginning July 1, 2009. A CASp should be on
staff in building inspection offices by July 1,
2010.
|
?New
state disability access commission part of the
solution. SB 1608 created a new
California Commission on Disability Access
(CCDA), which will be a 17-member state
advisory commission made up of legislative and
gubernatorial appointees from both the
disability and business communities. The
commission will be assigned the task of
evaluating and providing recommendations on
further disability access issues having an
impact on the disability and business
communities. |
When: The anticipated start date
for the commission is May 1, 2009.
The
commission's duties will include:
- Establishing a website resource for
businesses that provides information on
compliance with disability access laws.
- Establishing a master checklist for
building inspectors to use in determining
compliance with disability access laws, which
also can be used as a guide for business
owners.
- Evaluating continuing education
requirements for those involved in building
construction.
- Evaluating whether SB 1608 reforms are
working as they should and are effective.
|
|
?Deadline
for state to address inconsistencies between
state and federal regulations. A
significant frustration for the business
community has been inconsistent federal and
state regulations - compliance with one may
mean violation of the other. For the first time
ever, SB 1608 establishes a deadline for the
state to propose amendments to the federal
government that resolves these
inconsistencies. |
When: The deadline is December
31, 2010.
Resolving Lawsuits
Early
If a business owner
does get sued, how does SB 1608 help to
encourage early resolution of the
lawsuit?
Even when businesses have
reduced their chances of a lawsuit by hiring a
CASp to ensure their building is in compliance
and posting their CASp sign, unfortunately,
there is never a 100 percent guarantee of not
getting sued. However, SB 1608 gives
CASp-approved businesses some tools for helping
to resolve unnecessary litigation and
encouraging early resolution.
|
?90-day
stay of the lawsuit and early evaluation
conference. Businesses that have
been CASp-inspected before being sued - and
only those businesses - are entitled to request
a 90-day stay of the lawsuit and an Early
Evaluation Conference
(EEC). |
When: The anticipated date of
implementation is May 1, 2009.
- A stay is a temporary halting of all
litigation. A major benefit of halting
litigation temporarily is that attorneys will
not be able to engage in motions or discovery
and other activities that incur expensive
attorneys' fees.
- The EEC is a court-run conference between
the parties, at which the parties will have the
opportunity to explore whether the lawsuit can
be settled. For example, if the lawsuit is
based on an alleged violation that would be
easy for the business to fix, and the business
is willing to resolve the issue quickly, the
parties will be able to discuss whether further
litigation is necessary.
|
|
?How
to request the stay and EEC. A
defendant must file a request form with the
court within 30 days of being sued. The
appropriate form is required to be delivered
with the lawsuit, but all necessary forms and
instructions also will be made available on the
state's court self-help website later this
year. A link to this information will be posted
at www.calchamber.com/ADA when it becomes
available.
The court will grant the stay
and EEC upon receipt of the request and
schedule a time for the conference, within 50
days from the filing of the request. The
plaintiff and defendant will be directed to
appear in person at the time of the
conference. |
|
?Defendant
must provide the CASp inspection
report. No later than 15 days
before the EEC, the defendant absolutely must
file with the court and provide the plaintiff
with a copy of the CASp inspection report. If
the defendant does not do so, the court may
lift the stay absent a showing of good cause.
The confidentiality of the report must be
maintained until the conclusion of the
lawsuit.
The plaintiff, in turn, must
provide the court and defendant with a
statement that includes the basis for the
claimed violations, amount of damages claimed,
amount of attorney's fees and costs incurred to
date, and any settlement
demands. |
Reducing Unwarranted
Lawsuits
What elements of SB 1608
help to reduce unwarranted ADA lawsuit
practices?
SB 1608 also established
important reforms that will help to reduce
inappropriate attorney monetary demands and
provide significant clarifications in the law
for both plaintiffs and defendants concerning
recoverable damages and settlement offers:
|
?Attorneys
who issue demands for money must also provide
the business owner with an advisory
statement. SB 1608 requires that
written demands for money by attorneys be
accompanied by an explanation of the legal
rights of the building owner/tenant, including
the ability to contact their insurance company
as well as an attorney experienced with ADA
lawsuits. In addition, the advisory will
explain that receipt of a demand for money does
not necessarily mean the business is
liable.
Attorneys who fail to comply may
be reported to the State Bar. The advisory
statement will be available in multiple
languages on the state court
website. |
When: The anticipated
implementation date is May 1, 2009.
|
?Multiple
damages may not be recovered at a single
facility. SB 1608 will help to
ensure that damages may be claimed only for
violations the plaintiff personally encountered
or was deterred from on a particular occasion.
SB 1608 clarifies that a denial of full and
equal access constitutes one violation per
distinct facility for purposes of damages.
Damages may not be recovered for each and every
single offense that may exist at the particular
facility.
In addition, the plaintiff may
not recover for violations that may have
existed at a facility but which never caused
harm or injury to the plaintiff, either in the
form of an encounter or deterrence on a
particular
occasion. |
When: The anticipated
implementation date is May 1, 2009.
|
?Parties
will be encouraged to consider reasonable
settlement offers. SB 1608
clarifies that a court can consider, among
other relevant factors, reasonable written
settlement offers made and rejected by either
party in determining the amount of an
attorneys' fees award at the conclusion of a
case. |
When: The anticipated
implementation date is May 1, 2009.